An Exclusive Interview With Ministry's Paul Barker
By Jeff Kerby, Contributor
Wednesday, May 15, 2002 @ 1:36 PM
PAUL: To a degree, yeah. Honestly, having to watch the whole tour and edit the tape made us pretty fucking tired of that material! In some ways it was inspirational. We love the energy, we think its really great and weíre happy that the DVD captures that passion. KNAC.COM: How hard was it to narrow material down from all the performances that you viewed? Were there any particular problems posed trying to capture that live vibe on this project?
PAUL: The hard part was listening to sixty shows worth of material. On one hand, it wasnít too difficult because we didnít have any multi-track action to deal with -- all we had was board material. Just tapes of each show, so it was the same fucking thing, the same fucking fifteen or sixteen songs over and over. It was horrible. Sometimes, when we were listening to the shows, the first three songs might have been shitty, but then there would be one good one -- then the set would fall apart again. It was odd how some shows were consistently good all the way through, but then there would be some shows where everything just came together or fell apart for one song. Maybe it was that the fucking guitar cord came out -- just odd shit that happens. KNAC.COM: Thatís surprising. I would have figured that you would either have good shows or bad shows, but to hear you say that you might have a good song amidst other parts of the set that just werenít workingÖ
PAUL: Iím not saying that any parts of the show while it was being performed was just crap. Iím just saying that in reviewing it, itís a compromise. You have to find the best performance versus the best sound. That was the compromise. We didnít necessarily use the best sounding show. We tried to use the ones that were the best balance between the two -- the energy coming off the stage and Alís performance. What happened a lot of the time in the smaller venues was that the vocals were really loud because all the music coming off the stage is much softer. You tend to have outdoor shows that have the better overall mix. KNAC.COM: There was some question as to why you chose to document the Filth Pig tour.
PAUL: The main reason was because we wanted to have a visual document of the tour. In some ways we werenít happy putting out the DVD and the music on it. We are tired of the music and blah, blah, blah. If Sanctuary wanted to put out a CD, ok, thatís fine with us, weíll put one out, but the DVD has two more songs on it than the CD, and it was our primary focus.
PAUL: The problem is, you get more cynical. Thatís an issue. I think we just want the new album to be completely relentless and aggressive and in your face. Although we are going to be doing some experimentation -- for instance, itís not going to be straight ahead rock níroll -- we are not going to allow ourselves to go off into another planet or something. Our experiments are going to be kept to a minimum on this record. Itís just for the hell of it. We think we can still do it. The theme of this new record is animosity, so the new album title, Animositisomina is what weíre going with. The title isnít a new idea for us -- it just wasnít suitable before. KNAC.COM: When you listen to the radio, do you ever begrudge bands that have taken elements from your sound and made them more commercially successful?
PAUL: No, I donít because I donít think thatÖ first of all, itís not completely dog eat dog. Thereís plenty of money for everybody. We have chosen to create our own history and guide our own career. I donít necessarily want to say it was a conscious decision, however we were offered many, many, lucrative opportunities which we turned down. And so, looking back at those, had we made the other decision to go with the opportunities and so forth, we would have probably sold a lot more records, but thatís not really an issue for us. KNAC.COM: You do realize though that there will be a lot of people who would wonder whether you actually made those decisions or whether there were certain factors that contributed to you not being able to do it -- like whether Al was too strung out or unwilling to work.
PAUL: No, we definitely were the ones who decided that we werenít going to do those things. Nobody is going to tell me that there was some other reason for it. Anyway, itís ridiculous for people to think that because of the whole touring aspect of this band. Since I have been working with Al, weíve missed a total of four shows. Thatís just ridiculous. KNAC.COM: That is a commendable record, but you do have to admit that when many people hear the name Ministry, they think ďloudĒ, ďdrugsĒ -- and a potentially combustible lead singer.
PAUL: [Laughs] KNAC.COM: You laugh, but there is a large amount of people out there who would say that if they had to make a list of who might be the next Layne Staley, that Al would certainly be at or near the top of the it.
PAUL: Well, thatís funny because itís not going to happen. I am happy to say that. You know, Al and I have been doing press lately, and thatís what someone said yesterday. They brought up the same point -- he went off on a tirade on it, ďNow thatís not going to happenĒ and blah, blah, blah. I mean, come on -- his constitution, heís a bull. Whatever, Iíve been with Al a long time. KNAC.COM: Why do you think there are so many who are quick to condemn Layne or Al for their drug problems, be they either perceived or real?
PAUL: I donít know because I think that drug use and rock ní roll has been glamorized, you know, since the Ď60s. I think that thereís still a mystique there, perhaps. Whatever, itís been romanticized as if there was something cool about it. KNAC.COM: For example, Al gets voted as one of rocks biggest ďbad assesĒ on VH-1.
PAUL: What does that mean? KNAC.COM: Exactly, is it the possible drug connotation? What does he do? What is the criteria to be a bad ass?
PAUL: I donít know. Obviously, he wasnít #1, so what does everyone else do? KNAC.COM: Is he bad enough? Is he bad enough to work with that you donít want to see #1 or 2?
PAUL: Well then, the question becomes whoís doing the voting. Iím sure popularity has a lot to do with it as well as the perceived notion of ultimate rebellion, coolness and all that shit. KNAC.COM: Do you see him in that light or do you see him as just a guy in the band that you happen to work with?
PAUL: Al is definitely not just another guy in a band that I work with. We definitely have a relationship. Al is classic -- thereís no question about it -- and that for me is really fucking wonderful. He is, in many ways, larger than life. Ministry is very aware and happy with the knowledge that the success we have is for the most part squarely on our shoulders. Weíve done things wrong so many times and pissed off so many people and all of that kind of shit. Pretty much 90% of what weíve done since Iíve been working with Al has been to completely rub everyone the wrong way, so weíve been successful with that. I donít know how much the public knows, but weíre really happy that we did it our way.
Please log in to view RANTS
If you don't have a username, click here to create an account!